## EXPANDED MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN 100% INSPECTIONS

2019-06-19 - **How to apply the second edition of VDA Volume 5 in practice**

*08 April 2013: Stephan Conrad*

While developing the ISO 22514 series of standards, it is about time to think about the meaning and purpose of a capability index once again.

You often face capability indices for the first time when evaluating the number of defective parts. You can find countless tables in technical literature specifying fractions nonconforming expected for each specific capability index. This mainly superseded calculation method based on fractions nonconforming is still contained in ISO/TR 22514-4; however, only with reasonable restrictions. Almost 15 years ago, this method was even a standard in some parts of the automotive industry.

But why using quite an abstract capability index instead of “ppm”, many people asked themselves soon though. In case of capability indices exceeding 1,67 considerably, estimating fractions nonconforming is rather comparable to gazing into a crystal ball. The benefit was highly doubtful indeed. This capability index only provides information about the process output but does not indicate anything about the properties of the process or the process behavior. Moreover, completely different process qualities and process structures might lead to absolutely identical results (see figure 1). Consequently, even this capability index did not help to discover the factors to be optimized in order to reach full potential.

Other calculation methods calculate the capability index from distribution parameters and provide considerably more information...