GENERAL TOLERANCES IN THE GPS CONCEPT
2015-06-10 - How do "old" GPS standards agree with current ones?
Name | Usage | Duration |
---|---|---|
privacylayer | Status Agreement Cookie hint | 1 year |
Name | Usage | Duration |
---|---|---|
_ga | Google Analytics | 2 years |
_gid | Google Analytics | 1 day |
_gat | Google Analytics | 1 minute |
_gali | Google Analytics | 30 seconds |
19 November 2012: Gunter Effenberger
This article presents the basic standard ISO 8015 and illustrates its “umbrella function” for the entire series of GPS standards. We do not intend to discuss every single aspect of this standard but try to focus on the contents the author considers relevant for the purpose of defining specifications, especially of creating drawings, and interpreting them.
The introduction to ISO 8015 considers its function to be “fundamental” since it affects all other standards in the GPS matrix system including global, general and supplementary standards.
The title of this standard already implies that it contains concepts, principles and rules describing and defining fundamental and comprehensive aspects and, due their specification in an official standard, issues relevant to liability; applying this standard is an acknowledged rule of technology.
However, please note that the text of this standard only describes a single concept, no principles at all but 13 fundamental principles and 3 rules.
The heading of the 4th chapter literally reflects the authors’ efforts to implement their intentions neither as a principle nor as a rule. This fact is highly regrettable since the “assumptions for the reading of drawings” are of such vital importance that we rather hoped for clear “rules for the creation of drawings”.
Assumption 1 - functional limits
Assumption 2 - tolerance limits
Assumption 3 - workpiece functional limit
The 2nd assumption deserves an additional comment. The reader of the drawing has to assume that the product developer or design engineer is not addicted to safety thinking. He thus specified tolerance limits that are narrower than the functional limits. There are numerous real-life examples where the engineering department had narrowed the tolerances and in the end, this restriction led to major difficulties and incurred high process costs as soon as these characteristics were linked to process capability requirements...